CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 79EXPL: 1CVE-2023-48795 – ssh: Prefix truncation attack on Binary Packet Protocol (BPP)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-48795
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176280/Terrapin-SSH-Connection-Weakening.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Mar/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/18/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/19/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/17/8 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-48 • CWE-222: Truncation of Security-relevant Information CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2022-22721 – core: Possible buffer overflow with very large or unlimited LimitXMLRequestBody
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22721
If LimitXMLRequestBody is set to allow request bodies larger than 350MB (defaults to 1M) on 32 bit systems an integer overflow happens which later causes out of bounds writes. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52 and earlier. Si LimitXMLRequestBody está configurado para permitir cuerpos de petición de más de 350 MB (por defecto 1M) en sistemas de 32 bits, es producido un desbordamiento de enteros que causa posteriormente escrituras fuera de límites. Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52 y anteriores A flaw was found in httpd, where it incorrectly limits the value of the LimitXMLRequestBody option. This issue can lead to an integer overflow and later causes an out-of-bounds write. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/14/2 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00033.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RGWILBORT67SHMSLYSQZG2NMXGCMPUZO https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 24EXPL: 1CVE-2022-22720 – HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52 and earlier
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22720
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52 and earlier fails to close inbound connection when errors are encountered discarding the request body, exposing the server to HTTP Request Smuggling Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.52 y anteriores, no cierran la conexión entrante cuando son encontrados errores descartando el cuerpo de la petición, exponiendo al servidor al contrabando de peticiones HTTP A flaw was found in httpd. The inbound connection is not closed when it fails to discard the request body, which may expose the server to HTTP request smuggling. • https://github.com/Benasin/CVE-2022-22720 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/14/3 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00033.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RGWILBORT67SHMSLYSQZG2NMXGCMPUZO https:& • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 20%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44224 – Possible NULL dereference or SSRF in forward proxy configurations in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44224
A crafted URI sent to httpd configured as a forward proxy (ProxyRequests on) can cause a crash (NULL pointer dereference) or, for configurations mixing forward and reverse proxy declarations, can allow for requests to be directed to a declared Unix Domain Socket endpoint (Server Side Request Forgery). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.7 up to 2.4.51 (included). Un URI diseñado que es enviado a httpd configurado como proxy directo (ProxyRequests on) puede causar un fallo (desreferencia de puntero NULL) o, en el caso de configuraciones que mezclan declaraciones de proxy directo e inverso, puede permitir que las peticiones se dirijan a un endpoint de socket de dominio Unix declarado (Server Side Request Forgery). Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.7 hasta 2.4.51 (incluyéndola) There's a null pointer dereference and server-side request forgery flaw in httpd's mod_proxy module, when it is configured to be used as a forward proxy. A crafted packet could be sent on the adjacent network to the forward proxy that could cause a crash, or potentially SSRF via misdirected Unix Domain Socket requests. • http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/20/3 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BFSWOH4X77CV7AH7C4RMHUBDWKQDL4YH https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RGWILBORT67SHMSLYSQZG2NMXGCMPUZO https:// • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •