CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 13%CPEs: 35EXPL: 2CVE-2021-44790 – Possible buffer overflow when parsing multipart content in mod_lua of Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44790
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier. Un cuerpo de petición cuidadosamente diseñado puede causar un desbordamiento de búfer en el analizador multiparte mod_lua (r:parsebody() llamado desde scripts Lua). El equipo de Apache httpd no presenta constancia de que se presente una explotación para esta vulnerabilidad, aunque podría ser posible diseñar uno. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51193 https://github.com/nuPacaChi/-CVE-2021-44790 http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171631/Apache-2.4.x-Buffer-Overflow.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/20/4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 398EXPL: 30CVE-2021-44228 – Apache Log4j2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44228
Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. • https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan https://github.com/Puliczek/CVE-2021-44228-PoC-log4j-bypass-words https://github.com/cyberstruggle/L4sh https://github.com/woodpecker-appstore/log4j-payload-generator https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51183 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50592 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50590 https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner https://github.com/jas502n/Log4j2-CVE-2021-44228 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2021-23841 – Null pointer deref in X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-23841
The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/67 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/68 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/May/70 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=122a19ab48091c657f7cb1fb3af9fc07bd557bbf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8252ee4d90f3f2004d3d0aeeed003ad49c9a7807 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44846 https://security.gentoo.org/gls • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 1CVE-2020-15358 – sqlite: heap-based buffer overflow in multiSelectOrderBy due to mishandling of query-flattener optimization in select.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-15358
In SQLite before 3.32.3, select.c mishandles query-flattener optimization, leading to a multiSelectOrderBy heap overflow because of misuse of transitive properties for constant propagation. En SQLite versiones anteriores a 3.32.3, el archivo select.c maneja inapropiadamente la optimización query-flattener, conllevando a un desbordamiento de la pila de multiSelectOrderBy debido al uso inapropiado de las propiedades transitivas para la propagación constante A heap buffer overflow was found in SQLite in the query flattening optimization technique. This flaw allows an attacker to execute SQL statements to crash the application, resulting in a denial of service. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Dec/32 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Nov/19 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Nov/20 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Nov/22 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Feb/14 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-26 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200709-0001 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT211843 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT211844 https • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9518 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9518
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0727 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •