CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 3CVE-2012-0217 – FreeBSD - Intel SYSRET Privilege Escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-0217
The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and other products; Oracle Solaris 11 and earlier; illumos before r13724; Joyent SmartOS before 20120614T184600Z; FreeBSD before 9.0-RELEASE-p3; NetBSD 6.0 Beta and earlier; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Windows 7 Gold and SP1; and possibly other operating systems, when running on an Intel processor, incorrectly uses the sysret path in cases where a certain address is not a canonical address, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. NOTE: because this issue is due to incorrect use of the Intel specification, it should have been split into separate identifiers; however, there was some value in preserving the original mapping of the multi-codebase coordinated-disclosure effort to a single identifier. El modo de usuario Scheduler en el núcleo en Microsoft Windows Server v2008 R2 y R2 SP1 y Windows v7 Gold y SP1 sobre la plataforma x64 no maneja adecuadamente solicitudes del sistema, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener privilegios a través de una aplicación modificada, también conocida como "vulnerabilidad de corrupción de memoria de modo de usuario Scheduler". It was found that the Xen hypervisor implementation as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 did not properly restrict the syscall return addresses in the sysret return path to canonical addresses. An unprivileged user in a 64-bit para-virtualized guest, that is running on a 64-bit host that has an Intel CPU, could use this flaw to crash the host or, potentially, escalate their privileges, allowing them to execute arbitrary code at the hypervisor level. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46508 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/28718 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20861 http://blog.illumos.org/2012/06/14/illumos-vulnerability-patched http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2012/06/13/the-intel-sysret-privilege-escalation http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2012-003.txt.asc http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00001.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-06 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 165EXPL: 2CVE-2008-0960 – SNMPv3 - HMAC Validation error Remote Authentication Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-0960
SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC) C-series 1.0.0 through 2.0.0; (5) NetApp (aka Network Appliance) Data ONTAP 7.3RC1 and 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research before 16.2; (7) multiple Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE, and Nexus products; (8) Ingate Firewall 3.1.0 and later and SIParator 3.1.0 and later; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent 15.x; and possibly other products relies on the client to specify the HMAC length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass SNMP authentication via a length value of 1, which only checks the first byte. Una comprobación SNMPv3 HMAC en (1) Net-SNMP versión 5.2.x anterior a 5.2.4.1, versión 5.3.x anterior a 5.3.2.1 y versión 5.4.x anterior a 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) C-series versión 1.0.0 hasta 2.0.0 de Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC); (5) Data de NetApp (también se conoce como Network Appliance) ONTAP versiones 7.3RC1 y 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research versión anterior a 16.2; (7) múltiples productos Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE y Nexus; (8) Ingate Firewall versión 3.1.0 y posterior y SIParator versión 3.1.0 y posterior; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent versión 15.x; y posiblemente otros productos dependen del cliente para especificar la longitud del HMAC, lo que facilita que los atacantes remotos omitan la autenticación SNMP por medio de un valor de longitud de 1, que solo comprueba el primer byte. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5790 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2008//Jun/msg00002.html http://lists.ingate.com/pipermail/productinfo/2008/000021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-08/msg00000.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127730470825399&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0528.html http://secunia.com/advisories/30574 http://secunia.com/advisories/30596 http://secunia.com/advisories/30612 http://secunia.c • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 58EXPL: 0CVE-2003-0914
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-0914
ISC BIND 8.3.x before 8.3.7, and 8.4.x before 8.4.3, allows remote attackers to poison the cache via a malicious name server that returns negative responses with a large TTL (time-to-live) value. ISC BIND 8.3.x antes de 8.3.7, y 8.4.x antes de 8.4.3 permite a atacantes remotos envenenar la cache mediante un servidor de nombres malicioso que devuelve respuestas negativas con un valor TTL (time to live) largo. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenLinux/3.1.1/Server/CSSA-2004-003.0/CSSA-2004-003.0.txt ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/UnixWare/CSSA-2003-SCO.33/CSSA-2003-SCO.33.txt http://secunia.com/advisories/10542 http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert/57434 http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-409 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/734644 http://www.trustix.org/errata/misc/2003/TSL-2003-0044-bind.asc.txt https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository& •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 163EXPL: 0CVE-2003-0694 – Sendmail SMTP Address prescan Memory Corruption
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-0694
The prescan function in Sendmail 8.12.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via buffer overflow attacks, as demonstrated using the parseaddr function in parseaddr.c. La función de prescan en Sendmail 8.12.9 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante ataques de desbordamiento de búfer, como se demostró usando la función parseaddr en parseaddr.c. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2004.11/SCOSA-2004.11.txt http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2003-q3/4119.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q3/0113.html http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000742 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=106381604923204&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=106382859407683&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=106383437615742&w=2 http://marc.info/? •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 4%CPEs: 77EXPL: 0CVE-2003-0196
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-0196
Multiple buffer overflows in Samba before 2.2.8a may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service, as discovered by the Samba team and a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0201. Múltiples desbordamientos de búfer en Samba anteriores a 2.2.8a puede permitir a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario o causar una denegación de servicio, descubierto por el equipo de Samba y una vulnerabilidad distinta de CAN-2003-0201. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104973186901597&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104974612519064&w=2 http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-280 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:044 http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-137.html https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A564 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2003-0196 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1617001 •