CVE-2018-18066 – net-snmp: NULL pointer exception in snmp_oid_compare in snmplib/snmp_api.c resulting in a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-18066
snmp_oid_compare in snmplib/snmp_api.c in Net-SNMP before 5.8 has a NULL Pointer Exception bug that can be used by an unauthenticated attacker to remotely cause the instance to crash via a crafted UDP packet, resulting in Denial of Service. snmp_oid_compare en snmplib/snmp_api.c en Net-SNMP en versiones anteriores a la 5.8 tiene un error de excepción de puntero NULL que puede ser empleado por un atacante no autenticado para provocar el cierre inesperado de la instancia de forma remota mediante un paquete UDP manipulado, lo que resulta en una denegación de servicio (DoS). • https://dumpco.re/blog/net-snmp-5.7.3-remote-dos https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181107-0001 https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/7ffb8e25a0db851953155de91f0170e9bf8c457d https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/f23bcd3ac6ddee5d0a48f9703007ccc738914791 https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-18066 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637572 • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVE-2018-3693 – Kernel: speculative bounds check bypass store
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3693
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a speculative buffer overflow and side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y la predicción de ramas podría permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un desbordamiento de búfer especulativo y el análisis de canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions past bounds check. The flaw relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code and the fact that memory writes occur to an address which depends on the untrusted value. Such writes cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2384 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2390 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2395 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1946 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0174 https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/685359 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes+in+StruxureWare+Data+Center+Expert+v7.6.0 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180823-0001 https://www.oracle.com/s • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVE-2017-7657 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7657
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVE-2018-12538
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12538
In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. En Eclipse Jetty, desde la versión 9.4.0 hasta la 9.4.8, al emplear el FileSessionDataStore opcional provisto por Jetty para el almacenamiento persistente de detalles HttpSession, es posible que un usuario malicioso acceda/secuestre otras HttpSessions e incluso elimine HttpSessions sin coincidencias presentes en el almacenamiento FileSystem para FileSessionDataStore. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=536018 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html • CWE-6: J2EE Misconfiguration: Insufficient Session-ID Length CWE-384: Session Fixation •
CVE-2017-10346 – OpenJDK: insufficient loader constraints checks for invokespecial (Hotspot, 8180711)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-10346
Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Hotspot). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u161, 7u151, 8u144 and 9; Java SE Embedded: 8u144. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Java SE, Java SE Embedded, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE, Java SE Embedded. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101315 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039596 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2999 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3046 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3047 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3264 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3267 https://access.redhat.com/errata/ •