Page 9 of 94 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

An issue is present in Apache ZooKeeper 1.0.0 to 3.4.13 and 3.5.0-alpha to 3.5.4-beta. ZooKeeper’s getACL() command doesn’t check any permission when retrieves the ACLs of the requested node and returns all information contained in the ACL Id field as plaintext string. DigestAuthenticationProvider overloads the Id field with the hash value that is used for user authentication. As a consequence, if Digest Authentication is in use, the unsalted hash value will be disclosed by getACL() request for unauthenticated or unprivileged users. Hay un problema presente en Apache ZooKeeper 1.0.0 a 3.4.13 y 3.5.0-alpha a 3.5.4-beta. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108427 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3140 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1392 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/519eb0fd45642dcecd9ff74cb3e71c20a4753f7d82e2f07864b5108f%40%3Cdev.drill.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html&#x • CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource CWE-862: Missing Authorization •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

libxslt through 1.1.33 allows bypass of a protection mechanism because callers of xsltCheckRead and xsltCheckWrite permit access even upon receiving a -1 error code. xsltCheckRead can return -1 for a crafted URL that is not actually invalid and is subsequently loaded. libxslt hasta la versión 1.1.33 permite omitir los mecanismos de protección debido a que los callers xsltCheckRead y xsltCheckWrite permiten acceso incluso después de recibir el código de error -1. xsltCheckRead puede devolver -1 para una URL creada que no es realmente inválida y que se carga posteriormente. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00048.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00052.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00001.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/22/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/23/5 https • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

While handling a particular type of malformed packet BIND erroneously selects a SERVFAIL rcode instead of a FORMERR rcode. If the receiving view has the SERVFAIL cache feature enabled, this can trigger an assertion failure in badcache.c when the request doesn't contain all of the expected information. Affects BIND 9.10.5-S1 to 9.10.5-S4, 9.10.6-S1, 9.10.6-S2. Al gestionar un tipo concreto de paquete mal formado, BIND selecciona erróneamente un rcode SERVFAIL en lugar de un rcode FORMERR. Si la vista que se está recibiendo tiene la característica de caché SERVFAIL habilitada, esto puede desencadenar un fallo de aserción en badcache.c cuando la petición no contiene toda la información esperada. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103189 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040438 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01562 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0005 • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 2

_set_key in agent/helpers/table_container.c in Net-SNMP before 5.8 has a NULL Pointer Exception bug that can be used by an authenticated attacker to remotely cause the instance to crash via a crafted UDP packet, resulting in Denial of Service. _set_key en agent/helpers/table_container.c en Net-SNMP en versiones anteriores a la 5.8 tiene un error de excepción de puntero NULL que puede ser empleado por un atacante autenticado para provocar el cierre inesperado de la instancia de forma remota mediante un paquete UDP manipulado, lo que resulta en una denegación de servicio (DoS). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45547 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106265 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-978220.pdf https://dumpco.re/blog/net-snmp-5.7.3-remote-dos https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181107-0001 https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2018-18065 https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/7ffb8e25a0db851953155de91f0170e9bf8c457d https://usn.ubuntu.com/3792-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3792-2 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3792-3 • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •