Page 105 of 687 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 13%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier and JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to JavaFX, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0402, CVE-2013-2414, and CVE-2013-2427. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en el entorno de ejecución de Java (JRE) en el componente Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 y anteriores y JavaFX 2.2.7 y anteriores permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con JavaFX, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2013-0402, CVE-2013-2414 y CVE-2013-2427. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the JavaFX WebPage class. A descendant class can overwrite the getPage method with a custom pointer into the native function. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0757.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuapr2013-1928497.html http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-107A https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16416 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-2428 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953135 •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 3%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, and OpenJDK 7, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-1488 and CVE-2013-2426. NOTE: the previous information is from the April 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue is related to incorrect "type checks" and "method handle binding" involving Wrapper.convert. Una vulnerabilidad no especificada en el componente Java Runtime Environment (JRE) en Java SE versión 7 Update 17 y anteriores, y OpenJDK versión 7 de Oracle, permite a los atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, la integridad y la disponibilidad por medio de vectores desconocidos relacionados a Libraries, una vulnerabilidad diferente de CVE-2013-1488 y CVE-2013-2426. NOTA: la información anterior es de la CPU de abril de 2013. • http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/04/22/security-icedtea-2-3-9-for-openjdk-7-released http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/20f287fec09f http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00099.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0752.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0757.html http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201406-32.xml http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21644197 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories&# •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 23%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, 6 Update 43 and earlier, and 5.0 Update 41 and earlier; and OpenJDK 6 and 7; allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to AWT, as demonstrated by Ben Murphy during a Pwn2Own competition at CanSecWest 2013. NOTE: the previous information is from the April 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue is related to invocation of the system class loader by the sun.awt.datatransfer.ClassLoaderObjectInputStream class, which allows remote attackers to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. El componente Java Runtime Environment (JRE) en Java SE versión 7 Update 17 y anteriores, versión 6 Update 43 y anteriores, y versión 5.0 Update 41 y anteriores; y OpenJDK versiones 6 y 7 de Oracle; permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores relacionados a AWT, como fue demostrado por Ben Murphy durante una competencia Pwn2Own en CanSecWest 2013. NOTA: la información anterior es de la CPU de abril de 2013. • http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/04/22/security-icedtea-2-3-9-for-openjdk-7-released http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/04/25/security-icedtea-1-11-11-1-12-5-for-openjdk-6-released http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03898880 http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Pwn2Own-2013/ba-p/5981157 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/31c782610044 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-05 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 2EXPL: 1

The Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, and OpenJDK 6 and 7, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors involving reflection, Libraries, "improper toString calls," and the JDBC driver manager, as demonstrated by James Forshaw during a Pwn2Own competition at CanSecWest 2013. El componente Java Runtime Environment (JRE) en Java SE versión 7 Update 17 y anteriores, y OpenJDK versiones 6 y 7 de Oracle, permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores no especificados que implican reflexión, Libraries, "improper toString calls," y el administrador del controlador JDBC , como fue demostrado por James Forshaw durante una competencia de Pwn2Own en CanSecWest 2013. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the usage of java.sql.DriverManager. The issue lies in an implicit call to toString() that is made within a doPrivileged block. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/26135 http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/04/22/security-icedtea-2-3-9-for-openjdk-7-released http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/04/25/security-icedtea-1-11-11-1-12-5-for-openjdk-6-released http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Pwn2Own-2013/ba-p/5981157 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/a19614a3dabb http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-05/msg00007.html http://lists&# • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 82%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

The Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, 6 Update 43 and earlier, 5.0 Update 41 and earlier, and JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to 2D, as demonstrated by Joshua Drake during a Pwn2Own competition at CanSecWest 2013. El componente Java Runtime Environment (JRE) en Java SE versión 7 Update 17 y anteriores, versión 6 Update 43 y anteriores, versión 5.0 Update 41 y anteriores, y JavaFX versión 2.2.7 y anteriores de Oracle, permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores relacionados con 2D, como fue demostrado por Joshua Drake durante una competencia pwn2Own en CanSecWest 2013. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Oracle Java. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of CFF-based OpenType fonts. The issue lies in two operators that allow for reading and writing elements beyond the allocated buffers. • http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03898880 http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Pwn2Own-2013/ba-p/5981157 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Apr/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-05/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-06/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-06/msg00007.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=137283787 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •