CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 1CVE-2016-2183 – SSL/TLS: Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers (SWEET32)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2183
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. Los cifrados DES y Triple DES, como se usan en los protocolos TLS, SSH e IPSec y otros protocolos y productos, tienen una cota de cumpleaños de aproximadamente cuatro mil millones de bloques, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de cumpleaños contra una sesión cifrada de larga duración, según lo demostrado por una sesión HTTPS usando Triple DES en modo CBC, también conocido como un ataque "Sweet32". A flaw was found in the way the DES/3DES cipher was used as part of the TLS/SSL protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to recover some plaintext data by capturing large amounts of encrypted traffic between TLS/SSL server and client if the communication used a DES/3DES based ciphersuite. IBM Informix Dynamic Server suffers from dll injection, PHP code injection, and heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3110 – mod_cluster: remotely Segfault Apache http server
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3110
mod_cluster, as used in Red Hat JBoss Web Server 2.1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Apache http server crash) via an MCMP message containing a series of = (equals) characters after a legitimate element. mod_cluster, tal como se utiliza en Red Hat JBoss Web Server 2.1, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del servidor http de Apache) a través de un mensaje MCMP que contiene una serie de caracteres = (iguales) después de un elemento legítimo. It was discovered that it is possible to remotely Segfault Apache http server with a specially crafted string sent to the mod_cluster via service messages (MCMP). • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2054.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2055.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2056.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92584 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326320 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org&#x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2141 – JGroups: Authorization bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2141
It was found that JGroups did not require necessary headers for encrypt and auth protocols from new nodes joining the cluster. An attacker could use this flaw to bypass security restrictions, and use this vulnerability to send and receive messages within the cluster, leading to information disclosure, message spoofing, or further possible attacks. JGroups en versiones anteriores a 4.0 no solicita las cabeceras adecuadas para los protocolos ENCRYPT y AUTH desde los nodos uniéndose al grupo, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir las restricciones de seguridad y enviar y recibir mensajes dentro del grupo a través de vectores no especificados. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1435.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1439.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2035.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91481 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036165 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1345 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1346 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1347 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1374 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1376& •
CVSS: 4.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5304 – EAP: missing authorization check for Monitor/Deployer/Auditor role when shutting down server
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5304
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.4.5 does not properly authorize access to shut down the server, which allows remote authenticated users with the Monitor, Deployer, or Auditor role to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) en versiones anteriores a 6.4.5 no autoriza adecuadamente el acceso para apagar el servidor, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados con el rol Monitor, Deployer o Auditor causar una denegación de servicio a través de vectores no especificados. It was found that JBoss EAP did not properly authorize a user performing a shut down. A remote user with the Monitor, Deployer, or Auditor role could use this flaw to shut down the EAP server, which is an action restricted to admin users. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2538.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2539.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2540.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2541.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2542.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034280 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273046 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5304 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1CVE-2015-7501 – apache-commons-collections: InvokerTransformer code execution during deserialisation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7501
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x y 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x y 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x y 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x y Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 permiten que atacantes remotos ejecuten comandos arbitrarios mediante un objeto Java serializado manipulado. Esto está relacionado con la librería ACC (Apache Commons Collections). It was found that the Apache commons-collections library permitted code execution when deserializing objects involving a specially constructed chain of classes. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using the commons-collections library. • https://github.com/ianxtianxt/CVE-2015-7501 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2500.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2501.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2502.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2514.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2516.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2517.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2521.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2522.html http://rhn.redhat. • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •