CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7827 – Security: Wrong security context loaded when using SAML2 STS Login Module
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7827
The org.jboss.security.plugins.mapping.JBossMappingManager implementation in JBoss Security in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.3.3 uses the default security domain when a security domain is undefined, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging credentials on the default domain for a role that is also on the application domain. La implementación org.jboss.security.plugins.mapping.JBossMappingManager en JBoss Security en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) anterior a 6.3.3 utiliza el dominio de seguridad por defecto cuando un dominio de seguridad no está definido, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir las restricciones de acceso mediante el aprovechamiento de las credenciales en el dominio por defecto para un rol que también está en el dominio de la aplicación. It was found that when processing undefined security domains, the org.jboss.security.plugins.mapping.JBossMappingManager implementation would fall back to the default security domain if it was available. A user with valid credentials in the defined default domain, with a role that is valid in the expected application domain, could perform actions that were otherwise not available to them. When using the SAML2 STS Login Module, JBossMappingManager exposed this issue due to the PicketLink Trust SecurityActions implementation using a hardcoded default value when defining the context. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0215.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0216.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0217.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0218.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0850.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0851.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031741 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100889 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7827 https://bugzilla.red • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7853 – Subsystem: Information disclosure via incorrect sensitivity classification of attribute
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7853
The JBoss Application Server (WildFly) JacORB subsystem in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 6.3.3 does not properly assign socket-binding-ref sensitivity classification to the security-domain attribute, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging access to the security-domain attribute. El subsistema JBoss Application Server (WildFly) JacORB en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) anterior a 6.3.3 no asigna correctamente la configuración de la sensibilidad de las referencias a vinculaciones de sockets al atributo del dominio de seguridad, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados obtener información sensible mediante el aprovechamiento del acceso al atributo del dominio de seguridad. It was discovered that the JBoss Application Server (WildFly) JacORB subsystem incorrectly assigned socket-binding-ref sensitivity classification for the security-domain attribute. An authenticated user with a role that has access to attributes with socket-binding-ref and not security-domain-ref sensitivity classification could use this flaw to access sensitive information present in the security-domain attribute. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0215.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0216.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0217.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0218.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0920.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031741 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100891 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7853 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165522 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7849 – Management: Limited RBAC authorization bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7849
The Role Based Access Control (RBAC) implementation in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.2.0 through 6.3.2 does not properly verify authorization conditions, which allows remote authenticated users to add, modify, and undefine otherwise restricted attributes by leveraging the Maintainer role. La implementación Role Based Access Control (RBAC) en JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.2.0 hasta 6.3.2 no verifica correctamente las condiciones de la autorización, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados añadir, modificar y desdefinir atributos de otra manera restringidos mediante el aprovechamiento del rol de mantenador (Maintainer). It was discovered that the Role Based Access Control (RBAC) implementation did not sufficiently verify all authorization conditions that are required by the Maintainer role to perform certain administrative actions. An authenticated user with the Maintainer role could use this flaw to add, modify, or undefine a limited set of attributes and their values, which otherwise cannot be written to. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0215.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0216.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0217.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0218.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0920.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031741 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165170 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100890 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7849 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3464 – WS: Incomplete fix for CVE-2013-2133
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3464
The EJB invocation handler implementation in Red Hat JBossWS, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.2.0 and 6.3.0, does not properly enforce the method level restrictions for outbound messages, which allows remote authenticated users to access otherwise restricted JAX-WS handlers by leveraging permissions to the EJB class. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-2133. La implementación del manejador de la invocación EJB en Red Hat JBossWS, utilizada en JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.2.0 y 6.3.0, no aplica debidamente las restricciones de nivel de método para mensajes salientes, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados acceder a manejadores JAX-WS de otra manera restringidos mediante el aprovechamiento de permisos para la clase EJB. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para el CVE-2013-2133. It was found that the fix for CVE-2013-2133 was incomplete: the JAX-WS handlers were being executed for outbound messages even when authorization had failed. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1019.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1020.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1021.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102317 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95409 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3464 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3472 – Security: Invalid EJB caller role check implementation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3472
The isCallerInRole function in SimpleSecurityManager in JBoss Application Server (AS) 7, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.3.0, does not properly check caller roles, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass access restrictions via unspecified vectors. La función isCallerInRole en SimpleSecurityManager en JBoss Application Server (AS) 7, utilizada en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.3.0, no comprueba debidamente los roles de llamadores, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir las restricciones de acceso a través de vectores no especificados. It was found that the isCallerInRole() method of the SimpleSecurityManager did not correctly check caller roles. A remote, authenticated attacker could use this flaw to circumvent the caller check in applications that use black list access control based on caller roles. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1019.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1020.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1021.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0720.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69094 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103815 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95170 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3472 • CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •