CVE-2022-33741
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-33741
Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with the backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). Additionally the granularity of the grant table doesn't allow sharing less than a 4K page, leading to unrelated data residing in the same 4K page as data shared with a backend being accessible by such backend (CVE-2022-33741, CVE-2022-33742). Unas fuga de datos de frontends de disco/NIC de Linux Este registro de información de CNA se relaciona con múltiples CVE; el texto explica qué aspectos/vulnerabilidades corresponden a qué CVE.] Las interfaces de dispositivos Linux Block y Network PV no ponen a cero las regiones de memoria antes de compartirlas con el backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/05/6 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-403.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00000.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IGFTRZ66KQYTSYIRT5FRHF5D6O72NWOP https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RKRXZ4LHGCGMOG24ZCEJNY6R2BTS4S2Q https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5191 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-403 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVE-2022-33740
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-33740
Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with the backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). Additionally the granularity of the grant table doesn't allow sharing less than a 4K page, leading to unrelated data residing in the same 4K page as data shared with a backend being accessible by such backend (CVE-2022-33741, CVE-2022-33742). Unas fuga de datos de frontends de disco/NIC de Linux Este registro de información de CNA se relaciona con múltiples CVE; el texto explica qué aspectos/vulnerabilidades corresponden a qué CVE.] Las interfaces de dispositivos Linux Block y Network PV no ponen a cero las regiones de memoria antes de compartirlas con el backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/05/6 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-403.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00000.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IGFTRZ66KQYTSYIRT5FRHF5D6O72NWOP https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RKRXZ4LHGCGMOG24ZCEJNY6R2BTS4S2Q https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5191 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-403 • CWE-212: Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer •
CVE-2022-26365
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-26365
Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with the backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). Additionally the granularity of the grant table doesn't allow sharing less than a 4K page, leading to unrelated data residing in the same 4K page as data shared with a backend being accessible by such backend (CVE-2022-33741, CVE-2022-33742). Unas fuga de datos de frontends de disco/NIC de Linux Este registro de información de CNA se relaciona con múltiples CVE; el texto explica qué aspectos/vulnerabilidades corresponden a qué CVE.] Las interfaces de dispositivos Linux Block y Network PV no ponen a cero las regiones de memoria antes de compartirlas con el backend (CVE-2022-26365, CVE-2022-33740). • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/05/6 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-403.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00000.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IGFTRZ66KQYTSYIRT5FRHF5D6O72NWOP https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RKRXZ4LHGCGMOG24ZCEJNY6R2BTS4S2Q https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5191 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-403 • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVE-2022-33744
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-33744
Arm guests can cause Dom0 DoS via PV devices When mapping pages of guests on Arm, dom0 is using an rbtree to keep track of the foreign mappings. Updating of that rbtree is not always done completely with the related lock held, resulting in a small race window, which can be used by unprivileged guests via PV devices to cause inconsistencies of the rbtree. These inconsistencies can lead to Denial of Service (DoS) of dom0, e.g. by causing crashes or the inability to perform further mappings of other guests' memory pages. Los invitados Arm pueden causar DoS Dom0 por medio de dispositivos PV Al mapear páginas de invitados en Arm, dom0 está utilizando un rbtree para llevar a cabo un seguimiento de las asignaciones externas. La actualización de ese rbtree no siempre es realizado completamente con el bloqueo relacionado, resultando en una pequeña ventana de carrera, que invitados no privilegiados pueden usar por medio de dispositivos PV para causar inconsistencias en el rbtree. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/05/4 http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-406.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00000.html https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5191 https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-406.txt •
CVE-2022-2097 – AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-2097
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=919925673d6c9cfed3c1085497f5dfbbed5fc431 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a98f339ddd7e8f487d6e0088d4a9a42324885a93 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00019.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6CK57NBQFTPUMXAPJURCGXUYT76NQAK https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fe • CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •