Page 12 of 213 results (0.017 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

Format string vulnerability in libxml2 before 2.9.4 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via format string specifiers in unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad de formato de cadena en libxml2 en versiones anteriores a 2.9.4 permite a atacantes tener un impacto no especificado a través de especificadores de formato de cadena en vectores desconocidos. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00002.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00005.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/25/2 http://www • CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the scoped_search function in app/controllers/katello/api/v2/api_controller.rb in Katello allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) sort_by or (2) sort_order parameter. Múltiples vulnerabilidades de inyección SQL en la función scoped_search en app/controllers/katello/api/v2/api_controller.rb en Katello permite a usuarios remotos autenticados ejecutar comandos SQL arbitrarios a través de parámetro (1) sort_by o (2) sort_order. An input sanitization flaw was found in the scoped search parameters sort_by and sort_order in the REST API. An authenticated user could use this flaw to perform an SQL injection attack on the Katello back end database. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1083 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322050 https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/6051 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-3072 • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 148EXPL: 1

client_side_request.cc in Squid 3.x before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. client_side_request.cc en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 permite a servidores remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the way Squid processes ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a malicious server could use this flaw to crash the Squid worker process. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4455 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/5 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linu • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

mime_header.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 allows remote attackers to bypass intended same-origin restrictions and possibly conduct cache-poisoning attacks via a crafted HTTP Host header, aka a "header smuggling" issue. mime_header.cc en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 permite a atacantes remotos eludir restricciones destinadas al mismo origen y posiblemente llevar a cabo ataques de envenenamiento de caché a través de una cabecera HTTP Host manipulada, también conocido como un problema "contrabando de peticiones". An input validation flaw was found in Squid's mime_get_header_field() function, which is used to search for headers within HTTP requests. An attacker could send an HTTP request from the client side with specially crafted header Host header that bypasses same-origin security protections, causing Squid operating as interception or reverse-proxy to contact the wrong origin server. It could also be used for cache poisoning for client not following RFC 7230. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035769 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_8.txt http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 148EXPL: 0

Double free vulnerability in Esi.cc in Squid 3.x before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) response. Vulnerabilidad de liberación doble de memoria en Esi.cc en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 permite a servidores remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) a través de una respuesta Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipulada. An incorrect reference counting flaw was found in the way Squid processes ESI responses. If Squid is configured as reverse-proxy, for TLS/HTTPS interception, an attacker controlling a server accessed by Squid, could crash the squid worker, causing a Denial of Service attack. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/5 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •