CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 21%CPEs: 146EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4054 – squid: multiple issues in ESI processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4054
Buffer overflow in Squid 3.x before 3.5.17 and 4.x before 4.0.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. Desbordamiento de buffer en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. Buffer overflow and input validation flaws were found in the way Squid processed ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy, or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a remote attacker able to control ESI components on an HTTP server could use these flaws to crash Squid, disclose parts of the stack memory, or possibly execute arbitrary code as the user running Squid. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bi • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 154EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4051 – squid: buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4051
Buffer overflow in cachemgr.cgi in Squid 2.x, 3.x before 3.5.17, and 4.x before 4.0.9 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code by seeding manager reports with crafted data. Desbordamiento de buffer en cachemgr.cgi en Squid 2.x, 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.17 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.9 podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio o ejecutar código arbitrario sembrando informes manager con datos manipulados. A buffer overflow flaw was found in the way the Squid cachemgr.cgi utility processed remotely relayed Squid input. When the CGI interface utility is used, a remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/6 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/20/9 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/t • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2016-0695 – OpenJDK: insufficient DSA key parameters checks (Security, 8138593)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-0695
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to Security. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99 y 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; y JRockit R28.3.9 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la confidencialidad a través de vectores relacionados con Security. It was discovered that the Security component in OpenJDK failed to check the digest algorithm strength when generating DSA signatures. The use of a digest weaker than the key strength could lead to the generation of signatures that were weaker than expected. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 67%CPEs: 81EXPL: 0CVE-2016-3427 – Oracle Java SE and JRockit Unspecified Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-3427
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; and JRockit R28.3.9 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JMX. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99 y 8u77; Java SE Embedded 8u77; y JRockit R28.3.9 permite a atacantes remotos afectar a la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con JMX. It was discovered that the RMI server implementation in the JMX component in OpenJDK did not restrict which classes can be deserialized when deserializing authentication credentials. A remote, unauthenticated attacker able to connect to a JMX port could possibly use this flaw to trigger deserialization flaws. Oracle Java SE and JRockit contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Java Management Extensions (JMX). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1908 – openssh: possible fallback from untrusted to trusted X11 forwarding
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1908
The client in OpenSSH before 7.2 mishandles failed cookie generation for untrusted X11 forwarding and relies on the local X11 server for access-control decisions, which allows remote X11 clients to trigger a fallback and obtain trusted X11 forwarding privileges by leveraging configuration issues on this X11 server, as demonstrated by lack of the SECURITY extension on this X11 server. El cliente en OpenSSH en versiones anteriores a 7.2 no maneja correctamente falló en la generación de cookies para el reenvío X11 no confiable y confía en el servidor X11 local para las decisiones de control de acceso, lo que permite a los clientes remotos X11 activar un fallback y obtener privilegios de reenvío X11 confiables aprovechando los problemas de configuración de este servidor X11, como lo demuestra la falta de la extensión SECURITY en este servidor X11. An access flaw was discovered in OpenSSH; the OpenSSH client did not correctly handle failures to generate authentication cookies for untrusted X11 forwarding. A malicious or compromised remote X application could possibly use this flaw to establish a trusted connection to the local X server, even if only untrusted X11 forwarding was requested. • http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/15/13 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0465.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0741.html http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/84427 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034705 https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=ed4ce82dbfa8a3a3c8ea6fa0db113c71e234416c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-287: Improper Authentication •