Page 13 of 542 results (0.033 seconds)

CVSS: 5.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The Visual Sound (old) WordPress plugin through 1.06 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack The Visual Sound (old) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.06. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0ae1474c-9193-48ee-8cf6-d19900ad95f4 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The Review Ratings WordPress plugin through 1.6 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. The Review Ratings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d821a6d0-d749-4e02-9b7c-3065e66e1c97 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 5.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The infolinks Ad Wrap WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack The infolinks Ad Wrap plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/14b42ba8-7a8b-4fbf-86fb-6095879ec05c • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The Vikinghammer Tweet WordPress plugin through 0.2.4 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. The Vikinghammer Tweet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/2ba27715-add4-4e2c-ad0d-83ebdc26aec1 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The Special Feed Items WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. The Special Feed Items plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. • https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d5edf7ed-207c-48bb-9226-8647ad4348e4 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •