CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35966 – Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35966
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input syzbot reported rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old() is copying data without checking user input length. BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:632 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rfcomm_sock_setsockopt+0x893/0xa70 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:673 Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880209a8bc3 by task syz-executor632/5064 En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: Bluetooth: RFCOMM: solución al no validar la entrada del usuario de setsockopt. Syzbot informó que rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old() está copiando datos sin verificar la longitud de la entrada del usuario. BUG: KASAN: slab fuera de los límites en copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [en línea] BUG: KASAN: slab fuera de los límites en copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [en línea] ERROR: KASAN: losa fuera de los límites en rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:632 [en línea] BUG: KASAN: losa fuera de los límites en rfcomm_sock_setsockopt+0x893/0xa70 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/ sock.c:673 Lectura de tamaño 4 en addr ffff8880209a8bc3 por tarea syz-executor632/5064 • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f2c8a03fbb3048cf38b158f87aa0c3c09bca084 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eea40d33bf936a5c7fb03c190e61e0cfee00e872 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ea65e2095e9bd151d0469328dd7fc2858feb546 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c3f787a3eafe519c93df9abbb0ca5145861c8d0f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a97de7bff13b1cc825c1b1344eaed8d6c2d3e695 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35965 – Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35965
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input Check user input length before copying data. En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: Bluetooth: L2CAP: solución que no valida la entrada del usuario de setsockopt. Verifique la longitud de la entrada del usuario antes de copiar datos. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33575df7be6748292f88453f29319af6d639c5c8 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9d42f373391211c7c8af66a3a316533a32b8a607 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ee0c132a61df9723813c40e742dc5321824daa9 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f3951242ace5efc7131932e2e01e6ac6baed846 •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35950 – drm/client: Fully protect modes[] with dev->mode_config.mutex
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35950
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/client: Fully protect modes[] with dev->mode_config.mutex The modes[] array contains pointers to modes on the connectors' mode lists, which are protected by dev->mode_config.mutex. Thus we need to extend modes[] the same protection or by the time we use it the elements may already be pointing to freed/reused memory. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/client: Protege completamente los modos[] con dev->mode_config.mutex. La matriz modes[] contiene punteros a los modos en las listas de modos de los conectores, que están protegidos por dev- >mode_config.mutex. Por lo tanto, necesitamos extender modes[] la misma protección o, cuando la usemos, es posible que los elementos ya estén apuntando a la memoria liberada/reutilizada. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a2f957e3c4553bbb100504a1acfeaeb33f4ca4e https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41586487769eede64ab1aa6c65c74cbf76c12ef0 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2dc6600d4e3e1453e3b1fb233e9f97e2a1ae949 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18c8cc6680ce938d0458859b6a08b4d34f7d8055 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04e018bd913d3d3336ab7d21c2ad31a9175fe984 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ceb873d816786a7c8058f50d903574aff8d3764 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3eadd887dbac1df8f25f701e5d404d1b90fd0fea https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/ •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35949 – btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35949
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks We previously would call btrfs_check_leaf() if we had the check integrity code enabled, which meant that we could only run the extended leaf checks if we had WRITTEN set on the header flags. This leaves a gap in our checking, because we could end up with corruption on disk where WRITTEN isn't set on the leaf, and then the extended leaf checks don't get run which we rely on to validate all of the item pointers to make sure we don't access memory outside of the extent buffer. However, since 732fab95abe2 ("btrfs: check-integrity: remove CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY option") we no longer call btrfs_check_leaf() from btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), which means we only ever call it on blocks that are being written out, and thus have WRITTEN set, or that are being read in, which should have WRITTEN set. Add checks to make sure we have WRITTEN set appropriately, and then make sure __btrfs_check_leaf() always does the item checking. This will protect us from file systems that have been corrupted and no longer have WRITTEN set on some of the blocks. This was hit on a crafted image tweaking the WRITTEN bit and reported by KASAN as out-of-bound access in the eb accessors. The example is a dir item at the end of an eb. [2.042] BTRFS warning (device loop1): bad eb member start: ptr 0x3fff start 30572544 member offset 16410 size 2 [2.040] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [2.537] KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000018-0x000508800000001f] [2.729] CPU: 0 PID: 2587 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 [2.729] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [2.621] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] RSP: 0018:ffff88810871fab8 EFLAGS: 00000206 [2.621] RAX: 0000a11000000003 RBX: ffff888104ff8720 RCX: ffff88811b2288c0 [2.621] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff81dd8aca RDI: ffff88810871f748 [2.621] RBP: 000000000000401a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10210e3ee9 [2.621] R10: ffff88810871f74f R11: 205d323430333737 R12: 000000000000001a [2.621] R13: 000508800000001a R14: 1ffff110210e3f5d R15: ffffffff850011e8 [2.621] FS: 00007f56ea275840(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [2.621] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [2.621] CR2: 00007febd13b75c0 CR3: 000000010bb50000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [2.621] Call Trace: [2.621] <TASK> [2.621] ? show_regs+0x74/0x80 [2.621] ? die_addr+0x46/0xc0 [2.621] ? • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef3ba8ce8cf7075b716aa4afcefc3034215878ee https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e03418abde871314e1a3a550f4c8afb7b89cb273 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OTB4HWU2PTVW5NEYHHLOCXDKG3PYA534 •
CVSS: 8.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2024-35948 – bcachefs: Check for journal entries overruning end of sb clean section
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-35948
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bcachefs: Check for journal entries overruning end of sb clean section Fix a missing bounds check in superblock validation. Note that we don't yet have repair code for this case - repair code for individual items is generally low priority, since the whole superblock is checksummed, validated prior to write, and we have backups. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bcachefs: comprueba si hay entradas de diario que sobrepasen el final de la sección de limpieza de sb. Corrige una comprobación de límites faltantes en la validación de superbloque. Tenga en cuenta que todavía no tenemos un código de reparación para este caso; el código de reparación para elementos individuales generalmente tiene una prioridad baja, ya que todo el superbloque se suma, se valida antes de escribir y tenemos copias de seguridad. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcdbc1d7a4b638e5d5668de461f320386f3002aa • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •