Page 2 of 76 results (0.024 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0

Paramiko version 2.4.1, 2.3.2, 2.2.3, 2.1.5, 2.0.8, 1.18.5, 1.17.6 contains a Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in SSH server that can result in RCE. This attack appear to be exploitable via network connectivity. Paramiko en versiones 2.4.1, 2.3.2, 2.2.3, 2.1.5, 2.0.8, 1.18.5 y 1.17.6 contiene una vulnerabilidad de control de acceso incorrecto en el servidor SSH que puede resultar en la ejecución remota de código. Este ataque parece ser explotable mediante conectividad de red. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3497 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3347 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3406 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/1283 https://herolab.usd.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/usd20180023.txt https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00018.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/12/msg00025.html https://usn.ubuntu.com/3796-1 h • CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 2

An integer overflow flaw was found in the Linux kernel's create_elf_tables() function. An unprivileged local user with access to SUID (or otherwise privileged) binary could use this flaw to escalate their privileges on the system. Kernel versions 2.6.x, 3.10.x and 4.14.x are believed to be vulnerable. Se ha encontrado un error de desbordamiento de enteros en la función create_elf_tables() del kernel de Linux. Un usuario local sin privilegios con acceso al binario SUID (o a otro privilegiado) podría emplear este error para escalar sus privilegios en el sistema. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45516 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/20/2 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105407 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2748 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2763 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2846 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2924 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2933 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA- • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 152EXPL: 0

The Linux kernel, versions 3.9+, is vulnerable to a denial of service attack with low rates of specially modified packets targeting IP fragment re-assembly. An attacker may cause a denial of service condition by sending specially crafted IP fragments. Various vulnerabilities in IP fragmentation have been discovered and fixed over the years. The current vulnerability (CVE-2018-5391) became exploitable in the Linux kernel with the increase of the IP fragment reassembly queue size. El kernel de Linux en versiones a partir de la 3.9 es vulnerable a un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS) con tasas bajas de paquetes especialmente modificados que apuntan hacia el reensamblado de fragmentos de IP. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200115-01-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105108 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041476 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041637 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 74%CPEs: 127EXPL: 0

Linux kernel versions 4.9+ can be forced to make very expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. El kernel de Linux en versiones 4.9 y siguientes pueden forzarse a realizar llamadas muy caras a tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() y tcp_prune_ofo_queue() para cada paquete entrante, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. A flaw named SegmentSmack was found in the way the Linux kernel handled specially crafted TCP packets. A remote attacker could use this flaw to trigger time and calculation expensive calls to tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() and tcp_prune_ofo_queue() functions by sending specially modified packets within ongoing TCP sessions which could lead to a CPU saturation and hence a denial of service on the system. Maintaining the denial of service condition requires continuous two-way TCP sessions to a reachable open port, thus the attacks cannot be performed using spoofed IP addresses. • http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2018-004.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20181031-02-linux-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104976 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041424 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041434 https://access.redhat.co • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •