CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2024-38591 – RDMA/hns: Fix deadlock on SRQ async events.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-38591
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix deadlock on SRQ async events. xa_lock for SRQ table may be required in AEQ. Use xa_store_irq()/ xa_erase_irq() to avoid deadlock. En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: RDMA/hns: corrige el punto muerto en eventos asíncronos de SRQ. Es posible que se requiera xa_lock para la tabla SRQ en AEQ. Utilice xa_store_irq()/ xa_erase_irq() para evitar un punto muerto. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81fce6291d9999cee692e4118134a8c850b60857 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a3be1a0ffe04c085dd7f79be97c91b0c786df3d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/756ddbe665ea7f9416951bd76731b174d136eea0 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22c915af31bd84ffaa46145e317f53333f94a868 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/72dc542f0d8977e7d41d610db6bb65c47cad43e9 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d271e66abac5c7eb8de345b9b44d89f777437a4c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b46494b6f9c19f141114a57729e198698f40af37 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2024-38590 – RDMA/hns: Modify the print level of CQE error
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-38590
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Modify the print level of CQE error Too much print may lead to a panic in kernel. Change ibdev_err() to ibdev_err_ratelimited(), and change the printing level of cqe dump to debug level. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: RDMA/hns: Modifique el nivel de impresión del error CQE. Demasiada impresión puede provocar pánico en el kernel. Cambie ibdev_err() a ibdev_err_ratelimited() y cambie el nivel de impresión del volcado cqe al nivel de depuración. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c044adca272768d821921f11d3da4587dcec68a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45b31be4dd22827903df15c548b97b416790139b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc699b7eb2bc963c12ffcd37f80f45330d2924bd https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17f3741c65c4a042ae8ba094068b07a4b77e213c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f541a89ced8305da459e3ab0006e7528cf7da7b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/817a10a6df9354e67561922d2b7fce48dfbebc55 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06cf121346bbd3d83a5eea05bb87666c6b279990 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/349e859952285ab9689779fb46de163f1 •
CVSS: -EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2024-38589 – netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-38589
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl() syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f70 ---truncated--- En el kernel de Linux, se resolvió la siguiente vulnerabilidad: netrom: solucionó un posible bloqueo en nr_rt_ioctl() syzbot ama netrom y encontró un posible bloqueo en nr_rt_ioctl [1] Asegúrese de adquirir siempre nr_node_list_lock antes de nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1 ] ADVERTENCIA: se detectó posible dependencia de bloqueo circular 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 No contaminado --------------------- --------------------- syz-executor350/5129 está intentando adquirir el bloqueo: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+... }-{2:2}, en: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [en línea] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, en: nr_node_lock include/net/ netrom.h:152 [en línea] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, en: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [en línea] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock) {+...}-{2:2}, en: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 pero la tarea ya está bloqueada: fffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2: 2}, en: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [en línea] fffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, en: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [en línea] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, en: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 cuyo bloqueo ya depende del nuevo bloqueo. la cadena de dependencia existente (en orden inverso) es: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/ spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [en línea] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [en línea] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [en línea] nr_del_node+ 0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:13 41 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [en línea] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [en línea] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [en línea] do_syscall_64 +0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep. c:3134 [en línea] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [en línea] validar_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed /0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [en línea] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [en línea ] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [en línea] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [en línea] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket. c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [en línea] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [en línea] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 llamada_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [en línea] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f otra información que podría ayudarnos a depurar esto: Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- bloqueo(nr_node_list_lock); bloquear(&nr_nodo->nodo_lock); bloquear(nr_node_list_lock); bloquear(&nr_nodo->nodo_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 bloqueo retenido por syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, en: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [ en línea] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, en: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [en línea] #0: ffffffff8f70 ---truncado--- • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9d663fbf74290cb68fbc66ae4367bd56837ad1d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fbfb483c1a290dce3f41f52d45cc46dd88b7691 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b117e5b4f27c2c9076561b6be450a9619f0b79de https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/421c50fa81836775bf0fd6ce0e57a6eb27af24d5 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3db2fc45d1d2a6457f06ebdfd45b9820e5b5c2b7 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f28bdc2ee5d9300cc77bd3d97b5b3cdd14960fd8 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5fb7e2a4335fc67d6952ad2a6613c46e0 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2024-38588 – ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-38588
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location() KASAN reports a bug: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424 CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+ [...] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_report+0xcf/0x610 kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0 ftrace_location+0x90/0x120 register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40 kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example] do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0 do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0 load_module+0x3082/0x33d0 init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130 __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79 The root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address is being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages at the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the corresponding module is being deleted: CPU1 | CPU2 register_kprobes() { | delete_module() { check_kprobe_address_safe() { | arch_check_ftrace_location() { | ftrace_location() { | lookup_rec() // USE! | ftrace_release_mod() // Free! To fix this issue: 1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range(); 2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in ftrace_location(); 3. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae6aa16fdc163afe6b04b6c073ad4ddd4663c03b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eea46baf145150910ba134f75a67106ba2222c1b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1880a324af1c95940a7c954b6b937e86844a33bd https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ea8ef5e42173560ac510e92a1cc797ffeea8831 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbff5f0bfb2416b8b55c105ddbcd4f885e98fada https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b4881da5b19f65709f5c18c1a4d8caa2e496461 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66df065b3106964e667b37bf8f7e55ec69d0c1f6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31310e373f4c8c74e029d4326b283e757 • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2024-38587 – speakup: Fix sizeof() vs ARRAY_SIZE() bug
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-38587
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: speakup: Fix sizeof() vs ARRAY_SIZE() bug The "buf" pointer is an array of u16 values. This code should be using ARRAY_SIZE() (which is 256) instead of sizeof() (which is 512), otherwise it can the still got out of bounds. En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: Speakup: corrige el error sizeof() vs ARRAY_SIZE() El puntero "buf" es una matriz de valores u16. Este código debería usar ARRAY_SIZE() (que es 256) en lugar de sizeof() (que es 512), de lo contrario aún puede salirse de los límites. • https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/756c5cb7c09e537b87b5d3acafcb101b2ccf394f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f6b62125befe1675446923e4171eac2c012959c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6401038acfa24cba9c28cce410b7505efadd0222 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d130158db29f5e0b3893154908cf618896450a8 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89af25bd4b4bf6a71295f07e07a8ae7dc03c6595 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8defb1d22ba0395b81feb963b96e252b097ba76f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0efb15c14c493263cb3a5f65f5ddfd4603d19a76 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c8d2f34ea96ea3bce6ba2535f867f0d4e •