Page 3 of 30 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 2

An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the Psych::Emitter start_document function of Ruby. In Psych::Emitter start_document function heap buffer "head" allocation is made based on tags array length. Specially constructed object passed as element of tags array can increase this array size after mentioned allocation and cause heap overflow. Se presenta una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de pila explotable en la función Psych::Emitter start_document de Ruby. En la función Psych::Emitter start_document la asignación de "head" del buffer de heap es realizada en base a la longitud del array de etiquetas. • https://github.com/SpiralBL0CK/CVE-2016-2338-nday http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0032 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00032.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221228-0005 • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite HTTP Response Splitting. Si un programa que utiliza WEBrick inserta información no segura en el encabezado de respuesta, un atacante puede explotarlo para insertar un carácter newline para dividir un encabezado e inyectar contenido malicioso para engañar a los clientes. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/331984 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, an attacker can pass a large HTTP request with a crafted header to WEBrick server or a crafted body to WEBrick server/handler and cause a denial of service (memory consumption). En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, un atacante puede pasar una petición HTTP larga con una cabecera manipulada al servidor WEBrick o un cuerpo manipulado al servidor/manipulador WEBrick y provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de memoria). It was found that WEBrick could be forced to use an excessive amount of memory during the processing of HTTP requests, leading to a Denial of Service. An attacker could use this flaw to send huge requests to a WEBrick application, resulting in the server running out of memory. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103683 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0542 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, an attacker controlling the unpacking format (similar to format string vulnerabilities) can trigger a buffer under-read in the String#unpack method, resulting in a massive and controlled information disclosure. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, un atacante que controla el formato de desempaquetado (similar a las vulnerabilidades de cadena de formato) puede desencadenar una sublectura de búfer en el método String#unpack. Esto resulta en una gran divulgación de información controlada. A integer underflow was found in the way String#unpack decodes the unpacking format. An attacker, able to control the unpack format, could use this flaw to disclose arbitrary parts of the application's memory. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103693 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the UNIXServer.open and UNIXSocket.open methods are not checked for null characters. It may be connected to an unintended socket. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos UNIXServer.open y UNIXSocket.open no se comprueban en busca de caracteres null. Podría estar relacionado con un socket no planeado. It was found that the UNIXSocket::open and UNIXServer::open ruby methods did not handle the NULL byte properly. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103767 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00023.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00024.html& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte) •