Page 3 of 17 results (0.019 seconds)

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0

The DPDK vhost-user interface does not check to verify that all the requested guest physical range is mapped and contiguous when performing Guest Physical Addresses to Host Virtual Addresses translations. This may lead to a malicious guest exposing vhost-user backend process memory. All versions before 18.02.1 are vulnerable. La interfaz vhost de usuario de DPDK no verifica que el rango físico invitado solicitado esté mapeado y sea contiguo al realizar traducciones de direcciones físicas de invitado a direcciones virtuales del host. Esto podría conducir a que un invitado malicioso exponga la memoria del proceso del backend del usuario vhost. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1267 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2038 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2102 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2524 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2018-1059 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544298 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3642-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3642-2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1059 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

In Open vSwitch (OvS) 2.7.0, while parsing an OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY type OFP 1.0 message, there is a buffer over-read that is caused by an unsigned integer underflow in the function `ofputil_pull_queue_get_config_reply10` in `lib/ofp-util.c`. En Open vSwitch (OvS) versión 2.7.0, mientras analiza un mensaje OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY tipo OFP versión 1.0, se presenta una lectura excesiva búfer causada por un desbordamiento de enteros sin signo en la función “ofputil_pull_queue_get_config_reply10” en la biblioteca “lib/ofp-util.c”. An unsigned integer wrap around that led to a buffer over-read was found when parsing OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY messages in Open vSwitch (OvS). An attacker could use this issue to cause a remote denial of service attack. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2418 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2553 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2648 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2665 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2692 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2698 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2727 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/02/msg00032.html https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-May/332711.html https • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-191: Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

Ansible before versions 2.3.1.0 and 2.4.0.0 fails to properly mark lookup-plugin results as unsafe. If an attacker could control the results of lookup() calls, they could inject Unicode strings to be parsed by the jinja2 templating system, resulting in code execution. By default, the jinja2 templating language is now marked as 'unsafe' and is not evaluated. Ansible en versiones anteriores a la 2.3.1.0 y 2.4.0.0 no marca correctamente los resultados del plugin lookup como no seguros. Si un atacante pudiese controlar los resultados de las llamadas lookup(), podrían inyectar cadenas Unicode para que sean analizadas por el sistema de plantillas jinja2, resultando en una ejecución de código. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98492 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1244 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1334 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1476 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1499 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1599 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2524 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-7481 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/ed56f51f185a1ffd7ea57130d260098686fcc7c2 https://lists.deb • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 4.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 and earlier uses weak encryption to store passwords in /etc/shadow, which allows local users with superuser privileges to obtain user passwords via a brute force attack. SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 y versiones anteriores, utiliza un cifrado débil para almacenar contraseñas en /etc/shadow, lo que permite a usuarios locales con privilegios de superusuario obtener contraseñas de usuarios a través de un ataque de fuerza bruta. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/137525/Solarwinds-Virtualization-Manager-6.3.1-Weak-Crypto.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jun/38 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1

The RMI service in SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. El servicio RMI en SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 y versiones anteriores permite a atacantes ejecutar comandos arbitrarios a través de un objeto Java serializado manipulado, relacionado con la librería Apache Commons Collections (ACC). Solarwinds Virtualization Manager versions 6.3.1 and below suffer from a java deserialization vulnerability. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/137486/Solarwinds-Virtualization-Manager-6.3.1-Java-Deserialization.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jun/25 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jun/29 •