Page 30 of 211 results (0.020 seconds)

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 85EXPL: 0

Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA and WPA2) that supports IEEE 802.11w allows reinstallation of the Integrity Group Temporal Key (IGTK) during the group key handshake, allowing an attacker within radio range to spoof frames from access points to clients. Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA y WPA2) que soporte IEEE 802.11w permite la reinstalación de la clave temporal IGTK (Integrity Group Temporal Key) durante el handshake de clave de grupo, haciendo que un atacante en el rango de radio suplante frames desde los puntos de acceso hasta los clientes. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2017-10/msg00024.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2017-007.txt http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3999 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/228519 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101274 http • CWE-323: Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Go before 1.8.4 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1 allows "go get" remote command execution. Using custom domains, it is possible to arrange things so that example.com/pkg1 points to a Subversion repository but example.com/pkg1/pkg2 points to a Git repository. If the Subversion repository includes a Git checkout in its pkg2 directory and some other work is done to ensure the proper ordering of operations, "go get" can be tricked into reusing this Git checkout for the fetch of code from pkg2. If the Subversion repository's Git checkout has malicious commands in .git/hooks/, they will execute on the system running "go get." Go, en sus versiones 1.8.4 y versiones 1.9.x anteriores a la 1.9.1, permite que se ejecuten comandos "go get" de manera remota. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101196 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3463 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0878 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/22125 https://golang.org/cl/68022 https://golang.org/cl/68190 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/RinSE3EiJBI/kYL7zb07AgAJ https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00014.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 46%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0

In Apache httpd before 2.2.34 and 2.4.x before 2.4.27, the value placeholder in [Proxy-]Authorization headers of type 'Digest' was not initialized or reset before or between successive key=value assignments by mod_auth_digest. Providing an initial key with no '=' assignment could reflect the stale value of uninitialized pool memory used by the prior request, leading to leakage of potentially confidential information, and a segfault in other cases resulting in denial of service. En Apache httpd, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.34 y en versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.27, el valor placeholder en cabeceras [Proxy-]Authorization del tipo 'Digest' no se inicializó o reinició antes de o entre las asignaciones sucesivas key=value por mod_auth_digest. Proporcionar una clave inicial sin asignación "=" podría reflejar el valor obsoleto de la memoria agrupada no inicializada utilizada por la petición anterior. Esto podría dar lugar al filtrado de información potencialmente confidencial y, en otros casos, a un fallo de segmentación que daría como resultado una denegación de servicio (DoS) It was discovered that the httpd's mod_auth_digest module did not properly initialize memory before using it when processing certain headers related to digest authentication. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3913 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99569 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038906 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHS • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0

In Apache httpd 2.2.x before 2.2.33 and 2.4.x before 2.4.26, use of the ap_get_basic_auth_pw() by third-party modules outside of the authentication phase may lead to authentication requirements being bypassed. En Apache httpd, en versiones 2.2.x anteriores a la 2.2.33 y versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.26, el uso de ap_get_basic_auth_pw() por parte de módulos de terceros fuera de la fase de autenticación puede dar lugar a que se omitan requisitos de autenticación.. It was discovered that the use of httpd's ap_get_basic_auth_pw() API function outside of the authentication phase could lead to authentication bypass. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to bypass required authentication if the API was used incorrectly by one of the modules used by httpd. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99135 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038711 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3193 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHS • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1

In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •