CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5824 – libical: Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5824
libical 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free) via a crafted ics file. libical 1.0 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (uso después de liberación de memoria) a través de un archivo ics manipulado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/06/25/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/20/16 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91459 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0269 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0270 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1275400 https://github.com/libical/libical/issues/235 https://github.com/libical/libical/issues/251 https://github.com/libical/libical/issues/286 https://security.gentoo • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2016-8743 – httpd: Apache HTTP Request Parsing Whitespace Defects
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8743
Apache HTTP Server, in all releases prior to 2.2.32 and 2.4.25, was liberal in the whitespace accepted from requests and sent in response lines and headers. Accepting these different behaviors represented a security concern when httpd participates in any chain of proxies or interacts with back-end application servers, either through mod_proxy or using conventional CGI mechanisms, and may result in request smuggling, response splitting and cache pollution. El servidor HTTP Apache, en todas las distribuciones anteriores a la 2.2.32 y la 2.4.25 era liberal en el espacio en blanco aceptado de peticiones y enviado en lineas y cabeceras de respuesta. La aceptación de estos comportamientos diferentes representaba un problema a nivel de seguridad cuando httpd participa en cualquier cadena de proxies o interactúa con servidores de aplicaciones backend, ya sea mediante mod_proxy o utilizando mecanismos CGI convencionales y puede dar lugar al tráfico de peticiones, división de respuestas y contaminación de la caché. It was discovered that the HTTP parser in httpd incorrectly allowed certain characters not permitted by the HTTP protocol specification to appear unencoded in HTTP request headers. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3796 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95077 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037508 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0906 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1161 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1721 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 17%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5387 – HTTPD: sets environmental variable based on user supplied Proxy request header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5387
The Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.23 follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "This mitigation has been assigned the identifier CVE-2016-5387"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. El Apache HTTP Server hasta la versión 2.4.23 sigue a RFC 3875 sección 4.1.18 y por lo tanto no protege aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no confiables en ambiente variable de HTTP_PROXY, lo que puede permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de aplicación a un servidor proxy arbitrario a través de una cabecera Proxy manipulada en una petición HTTP, también conocido como problema "httpoxy". NOTA: el vendedor afirma "Se ha asignado a esta mitigación el identificador CVE-2016-5387"; en otras palabras, esto no es un CVE ID para una vulnerabilidad. It was discovered that httpd used the value of the Proxy header from HTTP requests to initialize the HTTP_PROXY environment variable for CGI scripts, which in turn was incorrectly used by certain HTTP client implementations to configure the proxy for outgoing HTTP requests. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00059.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1624.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1625.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1648.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1649.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1650.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3623 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797896 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 97%CPEs: 68EXPL: 10CVE-2015-7547 – glibc - 'getaddrinfo' Stack Buffer Overflow (PoC)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7547
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response that triggers a call to the getaddrinfo function with the AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6 address family, related to performing "dual A/AAAA DNS queries" and the libnss_dns.so.2 NSS module. Múltiples desbordamientos de buffer basado en pila en las funciones (1) send_dg y (2) send_vc en la librería libresolv en la librería GNU C (también conocida como glibc o libc6) en versiones anteriores a 2.23 permiten a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una respuesta DNS manipulada que desencadenan una llamada a la función getaddrinfo con la familia de direcciones AF_UNSPEC o AF_INET6, en relación con la ejecución de "consultas duales A/AAAA DNS" y el módulo libnss_dns.so.2 NSS. A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the way the libresolv library performed dual A/AAAA DNS queries. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted DNS response which could cause libresolv to crash or, potentially, execute code with the permissions of the user running the library. Note: this issue is only exposed when libresolv is called from the nss_dns NSS service module. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39454 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40339 https://github.com/fjserna/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/cakuzo/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/Stick-U235/CVE-2015-7547-Research https://github.com/t0r0t0r0/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/babykillerblack/CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/Amilaperera12/Glibc-Vulnerability-Exploit-CVE-2015-7547 https://github.com/miracle03/CVE-2015-7547-master https://github.com/bluebluelan/CVE-2015-7547&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3195 – OpenSSL: X509_ATTRIBUTE memory leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3195
The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. La implementación ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE en crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1q y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2e no maneja correctamente los errores provocados por datos X509_ATTRIBUTE malformados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible de memoria de proceso desencadenando un fallo de decodificación en una aplicación PKCS#7 o CMS. A memory leak vulnerability was found in the way OpenSSL parsed PKCS#7 and CMS data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause an application that parses PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources to use an excessive amount of memory and possibly crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •