Page 6 of 32 results (0.031 seconds)

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 88%CPEs: 345EXPL: 17

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. GNU Bash hasta 4.3 bash43-025 procesa cadenas finales después de la definición malformada de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos escribir hacia ficheros o posiblemente tener otro impacto desconocido a través de un entorno manipulado, tal y como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en la cual establecer el entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash. Nota: Esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2014-6271. It was found that the fix for CVE-2014-6271 was incomplete, and Bash still allowed certain characters to be injected into other environments via specially crafted environment variables. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34766 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35115 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36933 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34765 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34860 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34879 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 345EXPL: 53

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. GNU Bash hasta la versión 4.3 procesa cadenas finales después de las definiciones de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un entorno manipulado, tal como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en las cuales el ajuste de entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash, también conocido como "ShellShock." NOTA: la reparación original para este problema era incorrecta; CVE-2014-7169 ha sido asignada para cubrir la vulnerabilidad que todavía está presente después de la solución incorrecta. A flaw was found in the way Bash evaluated certain specially crafted environment variables. • https://github.com/darrenmartyn/visualdoor https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38849 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39918 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40619 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40938 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34900 https • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 54EXPL: 16

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 22%CPEs: 34EXPL: 1

Mozilla Firefox before 22.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.7, Thunderbird before 17.0.7, and Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.7 do not properly handle onreadystatechange events in conjunction with page reloading, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site that triggers an attempt to execute data at an unmapped memory location. Mozilla Firefox anterior a 22.0, Firefox ESR 17.x anterior a 17.0.7, Thunderbird anterior a 17.0.7, y Thunderbird ESR 17.x anterior a 17.0.7 no manejan adecuadamente los eventos "onreadystatechange" en conjunción con las recargas de página, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de aplicación) o posiblemente la ejecución arbitraria de código a través de un sitio web manipulado que provoca un intento de ejecución de datos y una asignación de memoria sin mapear. Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird do not properly handle onreadystatechange events in conjunction with page reloading, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or possibly execute malicious code via a crafted web site. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27429 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-07/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-07/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-07/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-07/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-07/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-07/msg00011.html http://rhn&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 5%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

OpenStack Object Storage (swift) before 1.7.0 uses the loads function in the pickle Python module unsafely when storing and loading metadata in memcached, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted pickle object. OpenStack Object Storage (swift) antes de v1.7.0 utiliza la función loads en el módulo pickle de Python de forma no segura al almacenar y cargar los metadatos en memcached, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un objeto pickle modificado. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/089472.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1379.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0691.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/16 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/4 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55420 https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1006414 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854757 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/ • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •