CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 80%CPEs: 24EXPL: 2CVE-2021-28165 – jetty: Resource exhaustion when receiving an invalid large TLS frame
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-28165
In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame. En Eclipse Jetty versiones 7.2.2 hasta 9.4.38, versiones 10.0.0.alpha0 hasta 10.0.1 y versiones 11.0.0.alpha0 hasta 11.0.1, el uso de CPU puede alcanzar el 100% al recibir una gran trama TLS no válida. When using SSL/TLS with Jetty, either with HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, or WebSocket, the server may receive an invalid large (greater than 17408) TLS frame that is incorrectly handled, causing high CPU resources utilization. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to service availability. • https://github.com/uthrasri/CVE-2021-28165 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/20/3 https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-26vr-8j45-3r4w https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r002258611ed0c35b82b839d284b43db9dcdec120db8afc1c993137dc%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03ca0b69db1e3e5f72fe484b71370d537cd711cbf334e2913332730a%40%3Cissues.spark.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r05db8e0ef01e1280cc7543575ae0fa1c2b4d06a8b928916ef65dd2ad%40%3Creviews.spark • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-551: Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2021-21409 – Possible request smuggling in HTTP/2 due missing validation of content-length
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-21409
Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty (io.netty:netty-codec-http2) before version 4.1.61.Final there is a vulnerability that enables request smuggling. The content-length header is not correctly validated if the request only uses a single Http2HeaderFrame with the endStream set to to true. This could lead to request smuggling if the request is proxied to a remote peer and translated to HTTP/1.1. This is a followup of GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj/CVE-2021-21295 which did miss to fix this one case. • https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-21295 https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/b0fa4d5aab4215f3c22ce6123dd8dd5f38dc0432 https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-f256-j965-7f32 https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0b09f3e31e004fe583f677f7afa46bd30110904576c13c5ac818ac2c%40%3Cissues.flink.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0ca82fec33334e571fe5b388272260778883e307e15415d7b1443de2%40%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https:& • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2020-13936 – Velocity Sandbox Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-13936
An attacker that is able to modify Velocity templates may execute arbitrary Java code or run arbitrary system commands with the same privileges as the account running the Servlet container. This applies to applications that allow untrusted users to upload/modify velocity templates running Apache Velocity Engine versions up to 2.2. Un atacante que es capaz de modificar las plantillas de Velocity puede ejecutar código Java arbitrario o ejecutar comandos de sistema arbitrarios con los mismos privilegios que la cuenta que ejecuta el contenedor Servlet. Esto se aplica a las aplicaciones que permiten a usuarios no confiables cargar y modificar plantillas de velocidad que ejecutan versiones de Apache Velocity Engine versiones hasta la 2.2 A flaw was found in velocity. An attacker, able to modify Velocity templates, may execute arbitrary Java code or run arbitrary system commands with the same privileges as the account running the Servlet container. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/10/1 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r01043f584cbd47959fabe18fff64de940f81a65024bb8dddbda31d9a%40%3Cuser.velocity.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0bc98e9cd080b4a13b905c571b9bed87e1a0878d44dbf21487c6cca4%40%3Cdev.santuario.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r17cb932fab14801b14e5b97a7f05192f4f366ef260c10d4a8dba8ac9%40%3Cdev.ws.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r293284c6806c73f51098001ea86a14271c39f72cd76af9e946d9d9ad%40%3Cdev.ws.apache.org%3E https://lists • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 16%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2021-21295 – Possible request smuggling in HTTP/2 due missing validation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-21295
Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients. In Netty (io.netty:netty-codec-http2) before version 4.1.60.Final there is a vulnerability that enables request smuggling. If a Content-Length header is present in the original HTTP/2 request, the field is not validated by `Http2MultiplexHandler` as it is propagated up. This is fine as long as the request is not proxied through as HTTP/1.1. If the request comes in as an HTTP/2 stream, gets converted into the HTTP/1.1 domain objects (`HttpRequest`, `HttpContent`, etc.) via `Http2StreamFrameToHttpObjectCodec `and then sent up to the child channel's pipeline and proxied through a remote peer as HTTP/1.1 this may result in request smuggling. • https://github.com/Netflix/zuul/pull/980 https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/89c241e3b1795ff257af4ad6eadc616cb2fb3dc4 https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r02e467123d45006a1dda20a38349e9c74c3a4b53e2e07be0939ecb3f%40%3Cdev.ranger.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r040a5e4d9cca2f98354b58a70b27099672276f66995c4e2e39545d0b%40%3Cissues.hbase.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r04a3e0d9f53421fb946c60cc54762b7151dc692eb4e39970a7579052%40%3Ccommits.servicecomb.apache.org • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0CVE-2021-25329 – Incomplete fix for CVE-2020-9484
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25329
The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. La corrección para el CVE-2020-9484 estaba incompleta. Cuando se usa Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.41, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.61 o versiones 7.0.0. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/2 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r11ce01e8a4c7269b88f88212f21830edf73558997ac7744f37769b77%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r732b2ca289dc02df2de820e8775559abd6c207f159e39f559547a085%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a2ac0e476dbfc1e6440b09dcc782d444ad635d6da26f0284725a5dc%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb51ccd58b2152fc75125b2406fc93e04ca9d34e737263faa6ff0f41f%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •