CVE-2021-25122 – Apache Tomcat h2c request mix-up
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-25122
When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. Cuando se responde a nuevas peticiones de conexión h2c, Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.41 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.61, podrían duplicar los encabezados de petición y una cantidad limitada del cuerpo de petición de una petición a otra, lo que significa que el usuario A y el usuario B podrían visualizar los resultados de la petición del usuario A A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat. When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/01/1 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b95bc248603360501f18c8eb03bb6001ec0ee3296205b34b07105b7%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVE-2021-27568 – json-smart: uncaught exception may lead to crash or information disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-27568
An issue was discovered in netplex json-smart-v1 through 2015-10-23 and json-smart-v2 through 2.4. An exception is thrown from a function, but it is not caught, as demonstrated by NumberFormatException. When it is not caught, it may cause programs using the library to crash or expose sensitive information. Se detectó un problema en netplex json-smart-v1 hasta el 23-10-2015 y json-smart-v2 hasta 2.4. Una excepción es lanzada desde una función, pero no es detectada, como es demostrado por la función NumberFormatException. • https://github.com/netplex/json-smart-v1/issues/7 https://github.com/netplex/json-smart-v2/issues/60 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb6287f5aa628c8d9af52b5401ec6cc51b6fc28ab20d318943453e396%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re237267da268c690df5e1c6ea6a38a7fc11617725e8049490f58a6fa%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf70210b4d63191c0bfb2a0d5745e104484e71703bf5ad9cb01c980c6%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https:/ • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions •
CVE-2020-13949 – libthrift: potential DoS when processing untrusted payloads
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-13949
In Apache Thrift 0.9.3 to 0.13.0, malicious RPC clients could send short messages which would result in a large memory allocation, potentially leading to denial of service. En Apache Thrift versiones 0.9.3 hasta 0.13.0, los clientes RPC maliciosos podrían enviar mensajes cortos que resultarían en una gran asignación de memoria, conllevando potencialmente a una denegación de servicio A flaw was found in libthrift. Applications using Thrift would not show an error upon receiving messages declaring containers of sizes larger than the payload. This results in malicious RPC clients with the ability to send short messages which would result in a large memory allocation, potentially leading to denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r01b34416677f1ba869525e1b891ac66fa6f88c024ee4d7cdea6b456b%40%3Cissues.hbase.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r02ba8db500d15a5949e9a7742815438002ba1cf1b361bdda52ed40ca%40%3Cissues.hbase.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r02f7771863383ae993eb83cdfb70c3cb65a355c913242c850f61f1b8%40%3Cissues.hbase.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0372f0af2dad0b76fbd7a6cfdaad29d50384ad48dda475a5026ff9a3%40%3Cissues.hbase.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r08a7bd19470ef8950d58cc9d9e7b02bc69c43f56c601989a7729cce5%4 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVE-2020-29582 – kotlin: vulnerable Java API was used for temporary file and folder creation which could result in information disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-29582
In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.21, a vulnerable Java API was used for temporary file and folder creation. An attacker was able to read data from such files and list directories due to insecure permissions. En JetBrains Kotlin versiones anteriores a 1.4.21, una API Java vulnerable era usada para la creación de archivos y carpetas temporales. Un atacante era capaz de leer datos de dichos archivos y enumerar directorios debido a permisos no seguros • https://blog.jetbrains.com https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2021/02/03/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2020 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2721aba31a8562639c4b937150897e24f78f747cdbda8641c0f659fe%40%3Cusers.kafka.apache.org%3E https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29582 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930291 • CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions •
CVE-2020-8554 – Kubernetes man in the middle using LoadBalancer or ExternalIPs
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8554
Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.externalIPs field, to intercept traffic to that IP address. Additionally, an attacker who is able to patch the status (which is considered a privileged operation and should not typically be granted to users) of a LoadBalancer service can set the status.loadBalancer.ingress.ip to similar effect. El servidor de la API de Kubernetes en todas las versiones permite a un atacante que puede crear un servicio ClusterIP y establecer el campo spec.externalIPs, interceptar el tráfico a esa dirección IP. Adicionalmente, un atacante que sea capaz de parchear el estado (que se considera una operación privilegiada y no se debe típicamente otorgar a los usuarios) de un servicio LoadBalancer puede configurar el status.loadBalancer.ingress.ip con un efecto similar A flaw was found in kubernetes. If a potential attacker can already create or edit services and pods, then they may be able to intercept traffic from other pods (or nodes) in the cluster. • https://github.com/jrmurray000/CVE-2020-8554 https://github.com/Dviejopomata/CVE-2020-8554 https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/97076 https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-security-announce/c/iZWsF9nbKE8 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0c76b3d0be348f788cd947054141de0229af00c540564711e828fd40%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1975078e44d96f2a199aa90aa874b57a202eaf7f25f2fde6d1c44942%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcafa485d63550657f068775801aeb706b7a07140a8ebbdef82 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-283: Unverified Ownership •