Page 76 of 578 results (0.044 seconds)

CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to corrupt virtual machine's memory and completely bypass Java sandbox restrictions. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2079.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2088.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2089.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2090.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2658.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0061.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3707 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93623 http://www • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1

Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.375 and 19.x through 23.x before 23.0.0.162 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.635 on Linux allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4277 and CVE-2016-4278, aka a "local-with-filesystem Flash sandbox bypass" issue. Adobe Flash Player en versiones anteriores a 18.0.0.375 y 19.x hasta la versión 23.x en versiones anteriores a 23.0.0.162 en Windows y SO X y en versiones anteriores a 11.2.202.635 en Linux permite a atacantes eludir restricciones destinadas al acceso y obtener información sensible a través de vectores no especificados, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2016-4277 y CVE-2016-4278, vulnerabilidad también conocida como un problema "local-with-filesystem Flash sandbox bypass". • http://lab.truel.it/flash-sandbox-bypass http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1865.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036791 https://blog.bjornweb.nl/2017/02/flash-bypassing-local-sandbox-data-exfiltration-credentials-leak https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb16-29.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-10 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4271 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi? •

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Microsoft Internet Explorer 10 and 11 mishandles integrity settings and zone settings, which allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." Microsoft Internet Explorer 10 y 11 no maneja adecuadamente ajustes de integridad y de zona, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox a través de un sitio web manipulado, vulnerabilidad también conocida como "Internet Explorer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". This vulnerability allows attackers to escape from the Enhanced Protected Mode sandbox on vulnerable installations of Microsoft Internet Explorer. ... An attacker who has gained code execution within the Internet Explorer Enhanced Protected Mode sandbox can leverage this component to place a malicious HTML file in a predictable location at medium integrity. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92808 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036788 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2016/ms16-104 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

Heap-based buffer overflow in the ClearKey Content Decryption Module (CDM) in the Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) API in Mozilla Firefox before 48.0 and Firefox ESR 45.x before 45.3 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by providing a malformed video and leveraging a Gecko Media Plugin (GMP) sandbox bypass. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en memoria dinámica en el ClearKey Content Decryption Module (CDM) en el Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) API en Mozilla Firefox en versiones anteriores a 48.0 y Firefox ESR 45.x en versiones anteriores a 45.3 podría permitir a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario proporcionando un vídeo malformado y aprovechando un Gecko Media Plugin (GMP) sandbox bypass. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00029.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1551.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3640 http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2016/mfsa2016-77.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92258 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036508 http://www.ubuntu.c • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

The PPAPI implementation in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82 does not validate the origin of IPC messages to the plugin broker process that should have come from the browser process, which allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via an unexpected message type, related to broker_process_dispatcher.cc, ppapi_plugin_process_host.cc, ppapi_thread.cc, and render_frame_message_filter.cc. La implementación PPAPI en Google Chrome en versiones anteriores a 52.0.2743.82 no valida el origen de los mensajes IPC para el plugin del proceso broker que debería haber llegado desde el proceso navegador, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir un mecanismo de protección sandbox a través de un tipo de mensaje inesperado, relacionado con broker_process_dispatcher.cc, ppapi_plugin_process_host.cc, ppapi_thread.cc y render_frame_message_filter.cc. • http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2016/07/stable-channel-update.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00028.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1485.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3637 http://www.securitytracker.com • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •