CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3195 – OpenSSL: X509_ATTRIBUTE memory leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3195
The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. La implementación ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE en crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1q y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2e no maneja correctamente los errores provocados por datos X509_ATTRIBUTE malformados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible de memoria de proceso desencadenando un fallo de decodificación en una aplicación PKCS#7 o CMS. A memory leak vulnerability was found in the way OpenSSL parsed PKCS#7 and CMS data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause an application that parses PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources to use an excessive amount of memory and possibly crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5194 – ntp: crash with crafted logconfig configuration command
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5194
The log_config_command function in ntp_parser.y in ntpd in NTP before 4.2.7p42 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (ntpd crash) via crafted logconfig commands. La función log_config_command en el archivo ntp_parser.y en ntpd en NTP anterior a versión 4.2.7p42, permite a los atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (bloqueo de ntpd) por medio de comandos logconfig creados. It was found that ntpd could crash due to an uninitialized variable when processing malformed logconfig configuration commands. • http://bk1.ntp.org/ntp-dev/?PAGE=patch&REV=4c4fc141LwvcoGp-lLGhkAFp3ZvtrA http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/170926.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/169167.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00048.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-07/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00042.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0780. • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5219 – ntp: infinite loop in sntp processing crafted packet
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5219
The ULOGTOD function in ntp.d in SNTP before 4.2.7p366 does not properly perform type conversions from a precision value to a double, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted NTP packet. La función ULOGTOD en el archivo ntp.d en SNTP en versiones anteriores a la 4.2.7p366 no realiza apropiadamente las conversiones de tipo de un valor de precisión a uno doble, lo que permite a los atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito) por medio de un paquete NTP creado. It was discovered that the sntp utility could become unresponsive due to being caught in an infinite loop when processing a crafted NTP packet. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/ntp_advisory4.asc http://bk1.ntp.org/ntp-dev/?PAGE=patch&REV=51786731Gr4-NOrTBC_a_uXO4wuGhg http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/170926.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/169167.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-September/166992.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00048.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates&#x • CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 5%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5300 – ntp: MITM attacker can force ntpd to make a step larger than the panic threshold
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5300
The panic_gate check in NTP before 4.2.8p5 is only re-enabled after the first change to the system clock that was greater than 128 milliseconds by default, which allows remote attackers to set NTP to an arbitrary time when started with the -g option, or to alter the time by up to 900 seconds otherwise by responding to an unspecified number of requests from trusted sources, and leveraging a resulting denial of service (abort and restart). La comprobación panic_gate en NTP anterior a versión 4.2.8p5 es solo habilitada nuevamente después del primer cambio al reloj del sistema que fue mayor que 128 milisegundos por defecto, permitiendo a los atacantes remotos fijar el NTP a un tiempo arbitrario cuando arranca con la opción -g, o alterar el tiempo hasta 900 segundos, de lo contrario por respuesta a un número no especificado de peticiones de fuentes de confianza y aprovechando una denegación de servicio resultante (anular y reiniciar). It was found that ntpd did not correctly implement the threshold limitation for the '-g' option, which is used to set the time without any restrictions. A man-in-the-middle attacker able to intercept NTP traffic between a connecting client and an NTP server could use this flaw to force that client to make multiple steps larger than the panic threshold, effectively changing the time to an arbitrary value at any time. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/ntp_advisory5.asc http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/170684.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/170926.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177507.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00060.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announc • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-361: 7PK - Time and State •
CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3900 – rubygems: DNS hijacking vulnerability in api_endpoint()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3900
RubyGems 2.0.x before 2.0.16, 2.2.x before 2.2.4, and 2.4.x before 2.4.7 does not validate the hostname when fetching gems or making API requests, which allows remote attackers to redirect requests to arbitrary domains via a crafted DNS SRV record, aka a "DNS hijack attack." RubyGems 2.0.x en versiones anteriores a 2.0.16, 2.2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.2.4 y 2.4.x en versiones anteriores a 2.4.7 no valida el nombre de host al recuperar gemas o hacer solicitudes de API, lo que permite a atacantes remotos redireccionar peticiones a dominios arbitrarios a través del registro DNS SRV manipulado, también conocido como un "ataque de secuestro de DNS". A flaw was found in a way rubygems verified the API endpoint hostname retrieved through a DNS SRV record. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to force a client to download content from an untrusted domain. • http://blog.rubygems.org/2015/05/14/CVE-2015-3900.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-August/163502.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-August/163600.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-August/164236.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1657.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/26/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2015-2511968.html http:// • CWE-254: 7PK - Security Features CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •