CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2015-7500 – libxml2: Heap buffer overflow in xmlParseMisc
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7500
The xmlParseMisc function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.3 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds heap read) via unspecified vectors related to incorrect entities boundaries and start tags. La función xmlParseMisc en parser.c en libxml2 en versiones anteriores a 2.9.3 permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (lectura de memoria dinámica fuera de rango) a través de vectores no especificados relacionados con límites de entidades y etiquetas de inicio incorrectos. A denial of service flaw was found in libxml2. A remote attacker could provide a specially crafted XML or HTML file that, when processed by an application using libxml2, would cause that application to crash. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00002.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00120.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-01/msg00031.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145382616617563&w=2 http://rhn.redhat • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2015-5312 – libxml2: CPU exhaustion when processing specially crafted XML input
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-5312
The xmlStringLenDecodeEntities function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.3 does not properly prevent entity expansion, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted XML data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3660. La función xmlStringLenDecodeEntities en parser.c en libxml2 en versiones anteriores a 2.9.3 no previene adecuadamente la expansión de entidad, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU) a través de datos XML manipulados, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2014-3660. A denial of service flaw was found in libxml2. A remote attacker could provide a specially crafted XML or HTML file that, when processed by an application using libxml2, would cause that application to use an excessive amount of CPU. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00002.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00120.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-01/msg00031.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145382616617563&w=2 http://rhn.redhat • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3195 – OpenSSL: X509_ATTRIBUTE memory leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3195
The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application. La implementación ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE en crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1q y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2e no maneja correctamente los errores provocados por datos X509_ATTRIBUTE malformados, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible de memoria de proceso desencadenando un fallo de decodificación en una aplicación PKCS#7 o CMS. A memory leak vulnerability was found in the way OpenSSL parsed PKCS#7 and CMS data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause an application that parses PKCS#7 or CMS data from untrusted sources to use an excessive amount of memory and possibly crash. • http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 53%CPEs: 22EXPL: 1CVE-2015-3113 – Adobe Flash Player Heap-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3113
Heap-based buffer overflow in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.296 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.194 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.468 on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as exploited in the wild in June 2015. Desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica en Adobe Flash Player anterior a 13.0.0.296 y 14.x hasta 18.x anterior a 18.0.0.194 en Windows y OS X y anterior a 11.2.202.468 en Linux permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores no especificados, tal y como fue utilizado activamente en junio del 2015. Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player allows remote attackers to execute code. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/37536 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00020.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00002.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1184.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75371 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032696 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug. • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •